The Story of Hafsa & Maria in Surat at-Tahreem

In the name of Allah, the Gracious, the Merciful

The gap verses of Sūrat al-Taḥrīm describe an occurrence, within which the Prophet, peace and blessings are upon him, prohibited him from one thing so as to please his wives. The classical commentators give 2 opinions: one is robust and authentic, and therefore the alternative is weaker and provokes dispute.It has been genuinely narrated on the authority of Aisha.

Might Allah be happy along with her, that the Prophet prohibited himself from drinking honey to please his wives. Aisha and Hafsa were upset that the Prophet was payment longer along with his better half Zainab on account of a honey drink she would serve him, so that they on the QT in agreement to faux to be pained by the odor. The Prophet failed to wish to offend his wives.

Thus he swore Associate in nursing oath ne’er to drink it once more. Allah discovered the verses telling the Prophet to not compel what’s lawful.Aisha reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would pay time along with his better half Zainab bint Jahsh and he would drink a concoction of honey. Hafsa and that I in agreement that whomever the Prophet visited initial, we’d say, “I notice a powerful odor of mimosa gum on you.

The Prophet visited one amongst them and she or he aforementioned this to him, therefore the Prophet said:I have taken a honey drink at Zainab’s house and that i won’t know once more.Why does one forbid yourself from what Allah has created lawful for you?The credibility of this narration is prescribed in line with Al-Bukhari and Muslim. Al-Bukhari enclosed it in his rationalization of Sūrat al-Taḥrīm.

Moreover, Aisha was the direct witness concerning whom the verses speak, thus she would grasp best what very happened.An alternative rationalization of the passage has been narrated by others. During this version, the Prophet prohibits himself from being intimate his paramour better half to please his alternative wives. Above all, it’s alleged that Hafsa became upset once the Prophet was intimate Maria the Copt in her house and on her bed.

This narration comes on the authority of Zaid ibn Aslam United Nations agency was from the third generation and not a witness to the events in question. Hence, Ibn Hajar rules that this narrations’s chain of authorities is incomplete (mursal) in Fatḥ al-Bārī 9/288. For this reason, the reason wasn’t universally prescribed by the classical commentators.Al-Qurtubi mentions initial the story of Aisha followed by narrations that embrace Maria.

The most correct of those opinions is that the initial of them, and therefore the weaker of them area unit the others.In alternative words, the authentic rationalization is that the one given by Aisha and therefore the stories that embrace Maria area unit weak by comparison.Indeed, the sole authentic narration is that it absolutely was concerning honey, that the Prophet drank it with Zainab, and Aisha and Hafsa fictitious to be pained by it.

There occurred what occurred and therefore the Prophet created Associate in nursing oath ne’er to drink it once more. He confided that to his better half and therefore the verse was discovered concerning all of them.In sum, the story concerning the dispute between Hafsa, Maria, and therefore the Prophet doesn’t have a powerful basis in Islam. It’s a part of the apocryphal traditions that area unit of variable and questionable degrees of credibility.

Rather, the strongest rationalization of the passage, passed down by the direct witness Aisha through Associate in nursing unbroken chain of authorities, is that the verses were discovered a couple of honey drink.The reason students are not blindly followed, albeit they are very pious and learned, is as a results of everyone makes mistakes. Every select provides a foul judgment at only one occasion or another.

If the statement of a guru conflicts with our conscience, then we have a tendency to should always not accept it.Abu Idrees reprted: Mu’adh ibn Jabal, may God be pleased with himI warn you of the deviation of the mentor, for the Devil can speak a word of misguidance through the mentor and conjointly the trickster can speak the truth. Thus, accept the truth for upon the truth is light-weight.

They said, “How can we have a tendency to all grasp if the mentor, may God have mercy on him, has spoken misguidance?” Mu’adh said:It is a word you reject from him and you say: what is this? Notwithstanding do not recede from him, for he may retract it and are available to variety of what you acknowledge. Verily, the place of faith and deeds is prepared until the Day of Resurrection, so whoever seeks them will notice them.

The ethical conscience of the believer may well be an important check on the misuse or abuse of the religion. All and varied has the potential to interpret the information of divine revelation, misinterpret the sacred texts, apply the principles, or, among the worst case, deliberately use the scripture for degree evil purpose. To catch au courant this, God gave North yankee nation degree innate sense of justice.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *